User Rating: / 0
PoorBest 

Today is the last day to submit comments to the Port Authority about its proposal to cut service by 35 percent in January to address a severe shortfall in state funding.

bus2If you think it's a good idea to lop off more than a third of our transit system, put more traffic on the parkways, make it even harder to find a parking space Downtown, strand thousands of elderly, handicapped and lower-income citizens, pollute the air more and increase the region's dependence on and consumption of foreign oil, just imitate your state legislators and do nothing.

If the transit cuts strike you as a supremely dumb idea, you might wish to offer your views before today's 4 p.m. deadline. And that deadline only applies to the Port Authority's public comment period -- you can let your legislators know how you feel anytime.

Photo: Wikimedia

Comments (2)Add Comment
TK
...
written by TK, August 31, 2010 - 04:19 PM
Thank you for the link to PAT. A comment has been sent.
avigilantone
...
written by avigilantone, September 04, 2010 - 11:13 AM
Making comments like “draconian service cuts” and “$7 fares” that make the headlines is an alarmist attempt to scare transit riders that are dishonest and unneeded.

The solution is simple.

First, raise the base fare to the cost of one gallon of gasoline, $3.00. That would equal the cost and consumption of the average commuter’s trip into the city. That is still far below the actual costs of gasoline, parking, maintenance, insurance, inspections and other automotive costs.

Based on the Authority’s figures of 230,000 daily riders and 260 business days each year (52 weeks X 5-day week), the combined would generate 59,800,000 fares, or $59.8 million with a $1.00 increase. This would turn a budget deficit into a $12.8 million surplus. Any possible short-term loss in ridership is balanced by the weekend fares that are not included in these figures. The new fare is still a bargain with the city’s looming parking lease proposal that will substantially increase downtown parking rates.

Second, address the salaries, healthcare and pension costs that will further put the Port Authority on a firmer financial footing. Renegotiate the driver’s highest salaries in the nation to match the national average. Healthcare costs must reflect what the public or commuter’s pay. Pension eligibility should mirror the Social Security requirement age of 65.

To blame the crisis on the Federal Government’s rejection of the tolling of Interstate-80 is dishonest as well. The Federal Highway Administration has followed the regulations that restrict tolling for the maintenance of that interstate and not for mass transit. The Legislature drafted lousy legislation that was illegal. If there is any blame, it is the Port Authority that lacks accountability. You’re building an unnecessary, over-budget “white elephant” known as the North Shore Connector for $528.8 million and we now have a dedicated funding stream in the “drink and car” rental taxes that also subsidizes mass transit.

The wasteful North Shore Connector can’t be stopped but the two suggestions will resolve your crisis.

Gary J. English
This e-mail address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it

Write comment
You must be logged in to post a comment. Please register if you do not have an account yet.

busy

Want to comment?

© 2011 Post-Gazette Publishing Co. All rights reserved. Privacy, usage and commenting policies.
Home | Sports | Arts & Entertainment | Living | News | Opinion | Contact Us | Post-Gazette.com