2010afinepointbloglogo_155
The editors who craft the Post-Gazette’s daily stands on the issues affecting the region, the state and the nation hold an on-line conversation with readers about key topics in the news. The PG editorial writers are: Tom Waseleski, Reg Henry, Susan Mannella, Tony Norman and Dan Simpson.

Guide to commenting | Terms of Service
 

Welcome to A Fine Point, a blog where you can comment on the issues of the day expressed in the Post-Gazette’s editorials.

Do you have something to say about a national topic, don’t like something that’s happening in Pennsylvania or want to speak your mind about a Pittsburgh subject?

Your chance to make a fine point not only to your neighbors but also to those who write the Post-Gazette’s official editorial viewpoints -- Tom Waseleski, Reg Henry, Susan Mannella, Tony Norman and Dan Simpson -- is here. Jump in early and often. The conversation is fine.

 
User Rating: / 0
PoorBest 

Allegheny County's regulation on air toxics was adopted in 1988 -- when Ronald Reagan was in the White House, the Soviets left Afghanistan and the Steelers had only a mere four Super Bowl rings.

A lot of pollution has come down the pike since then. Not that the Allegheny County Health Department has been lax. In fact, industries and environmentalists agree that the agency is a tougher regulator on emissions than the state would be.

So why is the county reluctant to update its rules for the 21st century?

Last July the county Board of Health tabled a regulation that would have replaced the old standard, which does not reflect the latest science. Then last month health board members gathered as part of an effort to become more educated on the subject and to reconsider updating the county's regulation.

It's not as if science sits still. New ways of measuring public health and the threats to it are always being found, and it's the duty of public boards and agencies to adopt the latest, most reliable gauges. A Post-Gazette story on Nov. 23 reported that Louisville, Ky., and the state of Texas were only two places that have significantly tightened standards on air toxics recently.

While Pittsburgh continues to hone its reputation -- as a leader in green technology, as a place worthy of the global events like the G-20 Summit and as America's most livable city -- it tops other lists as well, rankings that don't put a shine to the region's image.

For one thing, Allegheny County is home to the air monitor (in Liberty) that had the nation's dirtiest reading for small-particle pollution, based on 2005-07 data. A different report last year, based on 2002 data, showed that residents of Clairton and Glassport had some of the nation's highest risks of getting cancer due to air pollution.

While local industries, including U.S. Steel with its Clairton coke works, have taken steps and spent millions of dollars to improve the region's air, the job is not done. The county Board of Health can move the process along by applying the latest science to its toxic-air regulations.

Pittsburgh's well-being cannot be measured by the number of Steelers Super Bowl wins. Local residents are more concerned about how the region compares in health, education, security and opportunity.

In the standings that count, the region's people and their lungs deserve the latest standards. And the health board can certainly deliver them.

  

Comments (0)Add Comment

Write comment
You must be logged in to post a comment. Please register if you do not have an account yet.

busy

Want to comment?

© 2011 Post-Gazette Publishing Co. All rights reserved. Privacy, usage and commenting policies.
Home | Sports | Arts & Entertainment | Living | News | Opinion | Contact Us | Post-Gazette.com