User Rating: / 15
PoorBest 

Recent articles in the PG have cited the reality of hazardous chemicals being released into the air and water by Marcellus Shale gas well development. Apparently, there is some speculation about whether the "hazardous chemicals" can cause ill health to people. I cannot recall a case where hazardous chemical contamination was a benefit to people, even in small quantities.

The bottom line -- we have no idea what kind of hazardous chemicals are being dumped into our rivers. I conclude that this waste may jeopardize potable water supplied to our homes, workplaces and schools. If the chemicals cannot be removed before the waste is dumped into the rivers, then how will our utility companies remove them? It is true that our tap water goes through a thorough filtration process, but how can our treatment plants filter out new high-tech chemicals if they have no knowledge of them? If the chemicals were designed to dissolve solid rock hundreds of feet below the surface of the earth, we can't be talking about Coca-Cola.

Through science, we know that hazardous chemicals in our environment cause cancer, birth defects and other illnesses. How many people are we going to put in harm's way for a temporary supply of fuel? Is it fair for one group to profit from the Marcellus Shale developments while the greater population is faced with a possibility of long-term suffering?

The logical next step in Marcellus Shale development would be to scrap the project and work on an energy solution that is safe and sustainable. Why are we letting the gas industry put our lives in jeopardy?

TOM SARVER
Sewickley

< Prev		Next >